Coming back to complete the set-up is simple. Just click on the arrow to the right of the progress bar to see where you left off, then finish your set-up tasks.
Forbes.com looked at several factors for the 200 largest metro areas and divisions in the U.S. to determine America's Most Miserable Cities. Click here to see who made the list.
Ten Comeback Cit...Forbes.com used IRS data to locate counties that were losing net migrants in 2005 and that either gained them in 2010 or stemmed their losses dramatically. Migration figures refer to the net members of taxpaying households that moved into and out of these counties in the years ending in April. See Forbes interactive migration map.
The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Comcast.
PittsburghPittsburgh, Penn. (Allegheny County) 2005: net loss of 9,877 2010: net loss of 967
Steel City has reinvented itself as an education and health care hub, with below-average unemployment to show for it. Net migration was positive in 2009. See Pittsburgh migration.
The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Comcast.
BostonBoston, Mass. (Suffolk County) 2005: net loss of 15,774 2010: net loss of 7,400
Suffolk County is still losing taxpayers on balance to migration, but its low unemployment and storied institutions have drawn a new wave of inbound migrants from across the Northeast. See Boston migration.
The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Comcast.
PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia, Penn. 2005: net loss of 13,481 2010: net loss of 5,675
Like Boston, Philadelphia continues to lose migrants, but saw many more in-migrants and many fewer out-migrants in 2010 than in 2005. See Philadelphia migration.
The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Comcast.
Washington D.C.Washington, D.C. 2005: net loss of 6,237 2010: net gain of 1,513
A newly revitalized urban center—and plentiful government-driven jobs—have drawn a young generation of workers to the capital. See Washington, D.C. migration.
The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Comcast.
MinneapolisMinneapolis, Minn. (Hennepin County) 2005: net loss of 13,061 2010: net loss of 6,227
Minnesota's most populous county continues to lose taxpayers on balance, but inbound migration has grown, attracted to a region whose diverse economy has kept unemployment low throughout the recession, and to a vibrant city center. See Minneapolis migration.
The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Comcast.
MilwaukeeMilwaukee, Wisc. (Milwaukee County) 2005: net loss of 11,834 2010: net loss of 5,025
Many fewer people are leaving Milwaukee than in 2005, and more people are moving in, though the balance was still outward in 2010. See Milwaukee migration.
The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Comcast.
ArlingtonArlington, Va. 2005: net loss of 5,676 2010: net gain of 509
The innermost Virginia suburbs of Washington, D.C. benefited from strong job growth in the capital region, and from dense new developments near Metro stations that offer quick access by rail to the city center. See Arlington migration.
The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Comcast.
Level of MiseryForbes.com looked at several factors for the 200 largest metro areas and divisions in the U.S. to determine America's Most Miserable Cities. Click here to see who made the list.